What About Free Speech?

Stephen Boissoin committed the unpardonable sin six years ago when he wrote a letter to the editor criticizing attempts to introduce children and teenagers to homosexual conduct. So what happened?

Don’t Be a Marginal Christian

I read an excellent article today in the Christian Science Monitor about the future of the Evangelical Christian. In this article the author, Michael Spencer, lays out the reasons why the Western Church will fall in the next 10 years. Spencer would be labeled as a liberal by many in the evangelical community, yet he hits the nail on the head in this article. His argument is that The Church as focused its attention on numbers rather than The Gospel, on politics instead of Biblical truth, and on feeling good instead of knowing God.

The truth is that the Great Awakening of Jonathon Edwards is no where to be seen today. We receive our Biblical teaching on the T.V. screens rather than from the Bible. I am not one to knock ministers of the Gospel on T.V., but we as Christians need our own understanding of the Gospel from spending time with God. We rely too much on what a pastor 1,000 miles away tells us, and not enough on what the Word of God tells us.

Spencer says that secularism and people pleasing will dominate the Church in the next 10 years, and this will lead to the demolition of the current Church system, but he points out that this may be a good thing. The Church flourishes in persecution. The Church fails in complacency. The old saying goes “you don’t know what you got, ‘til it’s gone”, and this will be evident when the Church is gone.
Jesus said in John 4:23, “But an hour is coming, and now is, when the true worshipers will worship the Father in spirit and truth; for such people the Father seeks to be His worshipers.” This lets me know that “marginal Christians” will fade away and those who want His heart will prevail.

So this is my challenge to you. Don’t be that “marginal Christian”. Don’t be one of the ones that cause the Church to fall in the United States. Seek God and know Him. Don’t base your understanding by what you hear on T.V. or what you read here, but use T.V. and use this lead you to the Word of God. We face trying times ahead, but Psalm 37:25 says, “I have been young and now I am old, Yet I have not seen the righteous forsaken or his descendants begging bread.” God is faithful when we are faithless.

Carville Wanted Bush To Fail

james_carville11The news that Democratic strategist James Carville wanted President Bush to fail has been circulating for a couple of days now. According to FOX News, on the morning of September 11, 2001, just minutes before the terrorist attacks, Carville told a group of Washington reporters: “I certainly hope he doesn’t succeed.”

Carville was joined by Democratic pollster Stanley Greenberg, who seemed encouraged by a survey he had just completed that revealed public misgivings about the newly minted president.

“We rush into these focus groups with these doubts that people have about him, and I’m wanting them to turn against him,” Greenberg admitted.

Of course, as soon as Carville heard of the terrorist attacks, he announced to all the reporters he was having breakfast with for them to “Disregard everything we just said! This changes everything!” And the press did just that, never reporting anything that Carville had said, for months and years afterward.

Why is this bit of news important? Because the press went crazy when Rush Limbaugh recently said that he wanted President Obama to fail, talking endlessly about it and suggesting that Limbaugh and Republicans were unpatriotic.

Mr. Carville himself said on CNN: “The most influential Republican in the United States today, Mr. Rush Limbaugh, said he did not want President Obama to succeed.” “He is the daddy of this Republican Congress.”

Did Carville forget what he said about Bush in 2001? Of course not, he was just hoping everybody else wouldn’t find out about it – pot, meet kettle. Carville says that focusing on Limbaugh is a deliberate strategy and that Democrats hope it undermines Republicans. This piece of information was confirmed by the New York Times in a profile of David Axelrod, Obama’s closest political advisor:

He [Axelrod] also helps decide which fights to pick and which ones to avoid, making him a leading voice in setting the political tone in Washington. The recent back-and-forth with Rush Limbaugh, for example, was explicitly authorized by Axelrod, who told aides that it was not a moment to sit quietly after Limbaugh said he hoped that Obama would “fail.”

Limbaugh, for his part, said that he is rooting for the failure of Obama’s liberal policies. “The difference between Carville and his ilk and me is that I care about what happens to my country,” said Limbaugh on Wednesday. “I am not saying what I say for political advantage. I oppose actions, such as Obama’s socialist agenda, that hurt my country.”

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.